🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."